Yakov A. Jerkov

Can we make it trend patriots?? #TakeTheOath #WWG1WGA #QAnon@elenochle @kate_awakening @Inevitable_ET @GenFlynn @JuliansRum @Sun_Q_Tzu @PunishDem1776 @littllemel @Qanon76 @KarluskaP @QTheWakeUp @GoJackFlynn pic.twitter.com/sGlhfaNyzd

— Nurse Deplorable 🇺🇸 (@rn__deplorable) June 24, 2020

I redpilled my wife a while ago. She’s all-in!
#TakeTheOath #WWG1GWA #QAnon pic.twitter.com/YT7uZHJ7Ur

— Ryan Norton (@SkipNorton13) June 24, 2020

Oath taken#WWG1WGA #TakeTheOath pic.twitter.com/Lx1SV1gHnG

— ENoCH (@elenochle) June 25, 2020

#TakeTheOath #Qanon For God and Country. #WWG1WGA pic.twitter.com/BOok6mHlHB

— DaughterofVietnamVet❤️ (@rebecca20_20) June 25, 2020

4 years ago, I took this oath to serve in the greatest Navy on earth. Tonight, I am renewing that oath as a Digital Soldier! Take the oath! Pass it on, get it trending! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 #WWG1WGA #WWG1WGAWORLDWIDE #QAnon #DigitalSoldier #PassItOn #OnTheMove #GodWins #MAGA #KAG @GenFlynn pic.twitter.com/YqBQRX62G2

— QAnon John🇺🇸🐸 (@QStorm1111) June 25, 2020

#TakeTheOath #WWG1WGA pic.twitter.com/8dVfpbGhic

— Lisa Mei Crowley 🐸 (@LisaMei62) June 25, 2020

#TakeTheOath #MissionForward #wwg1wga #QAnons #WeAreQ #DigitalSoldiers @SavageDystrophy @ReeseJohn_ @LMBtakespics @Qtah17 @realDonaldTrump @GenFlynn pic.twitter.com/1CxpgiePma

— Patriot.Productions ... #Covfefe Ninja w/Camera (@MAGAJedi1745) June 25, 2020

Had to be quiet..... Wife and kids sleeping 😴😴😴💤💤💤 @cjtruth @Hev123truthsee1 @WhiteHouse @FREEDOM_WWGIWGA @RedPill78 @M_RevereUSA @M2Madness @KarluskaP @Qanon76 @EyesOnQ @WarNuse @AmCoTelegraph @elenochle @ChanelRion #allinthistogether #QAnon #WWG1WGA #TheGreatAwakening pic.twitter.com/HBE95FPaXQ

— TLR (@TLR78402825) June 25, 2020

Great news! #MAGA pic.twitter.com/haZ1HbVpNu

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 11, 2019

So Jerry Corsi was working with Mueller to sandbag me on a fabricated perjury charge.Mueller’s minion even promised Corsi no jail time if he would lie and say he gave me John Podesta’s stolen e-mails (which he did NOT) Then they were going to say I passed them on to Trump (which I did NOT) . Jerry was willing to LIE about me but not himself !

Now Jerry is lying about legitimate research he did for me regarding the Podesta brothers lucrative business in Russia. Jerry Corsi is starting to make Michael Cohen look like a stand up guy ! #weasel #liar @infowars_com @real_alexjones @wearebreitbart @wnd @dailyrogerstone @darrinmcbreen #maga

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Roger Stone (@rogerjstonejr) on Dec 29, 2018 at 12:30pm PST

What we need more than anything else from reporters is self-respect.

Zero people who covered the 2016 election on any level sincerely believe that a single Trump supporter is profoundly interested in rules of decorum.

Smart people are acting dumb for no good reason.

Harley-Davidson Inc. said Monday it plans to move production of motorcycles destined for the European Union to its international factories, in response to tariffs the EU has imposed on its bikes. [...]

Harley said the impact of the 31 percent tariffs, up from 6 percent previously, could be $100 million per year on the company, or roughly $2,200 per motorcycle.

“Harley-Davidson believes the tremendous cost increase, if passed onto its dealers and retail customers, would have an immediate and lasting detrimental impact to its business in the region, reducing customer access to Harley-Davidson products and negatively impacting the sustainability of its dealers’ businesses,” the company said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing.

Surprised that Harley-Davidson, of all companies, would be the first to wave the White Flag. I fought hard for them and ultimately they will not pay tariffs selling into the E.U., which has hurt us badly on trade, down $151 Billion. Taxes just a Harley excuse - be patient! #MAGA

One telling thing about Harley-Davidson's decision today is that they're willing to spend money and 18 months moving their production abroad. They clearly don't see Trump's trade war as a short blip.

The White House’s account of the Tillerson firing collapsed within minutes.

Senior administration officials told outlets including The Washington Post and CNN that Tillerson had been told he would be dismissed on Friday, March 9.

Within the hour, the State Department issued a statement insisting that Tillerson “had every intention of remaining” and “did not speak to the President this morning and is unaware of the reason.” CNN reported that Tillerson had received a call from White House Chief of Staff John Kelly on Friday night indicating that he would be replaced that did not specify timing; a senior White House official told the network that it was Trump himself who had suddenly decided to pull the trigger on Tuesday morning. Tillerson learned of his actual firing the same way everybody else did: By reading about it on Twitter shortly after 8:44 a.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 13.

A lot turns on that timing. On March 12, Tillerson had backed the British government’s accusation that Russia was culpable for a nerve-agent attack on United Kingdom soil. If Tillerson had been fired March 9, then his words of support for Britain could not explain his firing three days before. But if the White House was lying about the timing, it could be lying about the motive.

And since it now seems all but certain that the White House was lying about the timing, it looks more probable that it was lying about the motive too.

That suspicion was accelerated by the president’s words to the White House press corps before stepping aboard Marine One:

“As soon as we get the facts straight, if we agree with them, we will condemn Russia or whoever it may be.”

That is not support for Britain. It is the direct opposite.

Britain and the United States share intelligence information fully, freely, and seamlessly. It’s inconceivable that the U.S. government has not already seen all the information that Theresa May saw before she rose in the House of Commons to accuse Russia.

If the U.S. government had a serious concern about the reliability of that information, it would have expressed that concern directly and privately to the U.K. government before May spoke. But the U.S. had no such concern—that’s why the now-fired secretary of state and the U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom both endorsed May’s words. When Trump raises doubts about the facts, about American agreement with its British ally, about the accuracy of the British accusation against Russia, Trump is not expressing good-faith uncertainty about imperfect information. Trump is rejecting the consensus view of the U.K. and U.S. intelligence communities about an act of Russian aggression—and, if his past behavior is any indication, preparing the way for his own determination to do nothing.

It echoes the approach he took toward Russian intervention in the U.S. election to help elect him in 2016: Feign uncertainty about what is not uncertain in order to justify inaction.

The U.S.-U.K. response to the Russian nerve gas attack should have been coordinated in advance. It was not. The U.S. statement of support for Britain should have arrived on the day that the prime minister delivered her accusation. It did not. The retaliation—if any—should also already be agreed upon. It plainly has not been.

The United Kingdom does not find itself deprived of U.S. support because of some British mistake or rush to judgment. Most of the U.S. government shares the British assessment of what happened—as attested by Tillerson’s statement in support of Britain, which would have relied on U.S. intelligence agency reports. Only Trump stands apart, vetoing any condemnation of Russia and perhaps punishing his secretary of state for breaking ranks on the president’s no-criticizing-Putin policy. [...]

On March 10, 2018, the president’s son tweeted:

I’m so glad to wake up in a country where we finally have a president who cares more about America than he does about our enemies feelings. Very refreshing!!! #maga

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) March 10, 2018

But apparently some enemies’ feelings command more sensitivity than others.

Yesterday, the Republicans on the House intelligence committee announced that they had concluded the investigation of the Russian interference—and would soon publish a report acquitting Trump of collusion. Bad luck for them to release the report on the very day that Trump again demonstrated that something is very, very wrong in the Trump-Russia relationship. It’s possible to imagine innocent explanations. And it’s easy to list the plausible explanations. Ominously for the western alliance and the security of the United States, those two sets no longer overlap at all.

They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. Nice

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 15, 2017

You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history - led by some very bad and conflicted people! #MAGA

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 15, 2017

svensk_vanja

Why is that Hillary Clintons family and Dems dealings with Russia are not looked at, but my non-dealings are?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 15, 2017

Crooked H destroyed phones w/ hammer, 'bleached' emails, & had husband meet w/AG days before she was cleared- & they talk about obstruction?

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 15, 2017