Республиканцы
Jul. 20th, 2017 08:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
yakov_a_jerkovТрамп дал очередное эпическое интервью, в этот раз NYT. ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
rsokolov написал о части интервью, касающейся конфликта интересов Мюллера, а я напишу о части про Сешнса.
И тем не менее:
rsokolov написал о части интервью, касающейся конфликта интересов Мюллера, а я напишу о части про Сешнса. TRUMP: Because I have done nothing wrong. A special counsel should never have been appointed in this case.Оставляя даже в стороне всю бредовость "он мне должен был сказать до назначения, что возьмет отвод", главное тут в том, что Трамп явно считает, что Attorney General работает на него, на Трампа. И республиканские сенаторы это прекрасно понимают. Как понимают и то, что это, мягко говоря, disturbing.
BAKER: Can we put that on the record?
TRUMP: Because so far, the only — yeah, you can put it down.
SCHMIDT: Was that [Attorney General Jeff] Sessions’s mistake or [Deputy Attorney General Rod J.] Rosenstein’s mistake?
________
TRUMP: Look, Sessions gets the job. Right after he gets the job, he recuses himself.
BAKER: Was that a mistake?
TRUMP: Well, Sessions should have never recused himself, and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job, and I would have picked somebody else.
HABERMAN: He gave you no heads up at all, in any sense?
TRUMP: Zero. So Jeff Sessions takes the job, gets into the job, recuses himself. I then have — which, frankly, I think is very unfair to the president. How do you take a job and then recuse yourself? If he would have recused himself before the job, I would have said, “Thanks, Jeff, but I can’t, you know, I’m not going to take you.” It’s extremely unfair, and that’s a mild word, to the president. So he recuses himself. I then end up with a second man, who’s a deputy.
HABERMAN: Rosenstein.
TRUMP: Who is he? And Jeff hardly knew. He’s from Baltimore.
________
TRUMP: Yeah, what Jeff Sessions did was he recused himself right after, right after he became attorney general. And I said, “Why didn’t you tell me this before?” I would have — then I said, “Who’s your deputy?” So his deputy he hardly knew, and that’s Rosenstein, Rod Rosenstein, who is from Baltimore. There are very few Republicans in Baltimore, if any. So, he’s from Baltimore. Now, he, we went through a lot of things. We were interviewing replacements at the F.B.I. Did you know Mueller was one of the people that was being interviewed?
И тем не менее:
A group of Republican senators criticized President Donald Trump on Thursday, a day after the President rebuked top law enforcement officials in an interview with The New York Times.
"The attorney general is America's top law enforcement official," one GOP senator said. "It's unclear if he understands that, and that's pretty disturbing."
The senator was referring to Trump's comment in the Times' interview that he would not have hired Attorney General Jeff Sessions had he known Sessions would go on to recuse himself from investigations related to the 2016 campaign. The senator said Trump seemed to be thinking of the law enforcement heads as his personal employees.
"One gets the impression that the President doesn't understand or he willfully disregards the fact that the attorney general and law enforcement in general -- they are not his personal lawyers to defend and protect him," one GOP senator told CNN. "He has (his) own personal lawyers, and of course, the White House has the White House counsel's office."
That Republican senator and two others spoke on background with CNN to avoid prompting a fight with the President. Maine GOP Sen. Susan Collins was the only one of the four to speak on the record in response to Trump's comments about Sessions, acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe and former FBI Director James Comey as well as his venting about the special counsel investigation into Russian attempts to influence the 2016 election. [...]
The third Republican said he was stunned by Trump's remark on Mueller, although he said "at this point" perhaps it shouldn't surprise him.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2017-07-21 11:49 am (UTC)Или, с юридической точки зрения, то и другое выглядит вполне одинаково?
no subject
Date: 2017-07-21 12:21 pm (UTC)Какой нафиг слесарь? Мы тут обсуждаем attorney general и его обязанности. Я вам привела дословные цитаты из закона, создавшего department of justice.
"Слесарь нанимаемый частным лицом" и "attorney general" не выглядят для меня одинаковыми ни разу. Даже "слесарь, работающий в компании X" и "general counsel компании X" для меня имеют очень разные обязанности и ответственности.
Идите уже в law schооl. Может вас там чему-нибудь научат, и вам не придется бросаться на ЖЖ-юзеров и спрашивать у них что-то "как у юристов".
no subject
Date: 2017-07-21 12:40 pm (UTC)Пожалуйста.
Вы, как не-юрист, но, как человек, который получил юридическое образование, и читал юридические книжки, с высоты этих знаний (но не в порядке юридического совета, все дисклеймеры), считаете, что:
"Генеральный прокурор может поручать работу подчиненным" и
"Генеральный прокурор может полностью устраниться от какой-то работы, включая контроль за ней, в том числе, за ее законностью",
Это одно и то же?
no subject
Date: 2017-07-21 12:50 pm (UTC)при этом я несомненно считаю, что главный прокурор не только может, но и обязан устраниться от работы, в которой у него может быть conflict of interest.
но Трамп может уволить Сешшинза хоть сегодня. Я по Сешшинзу жалеть не буду.