Республиканцы

[yakov_a_jerkov]

Трамп дал очередное эпическое интервью, в этот раз NYT. rsokolov написал о части интервью, касающейся конфликта интересов Мюллера, а я напишу о части про Сешнса.

TRUMP: Because I have done nothing wrong. A special counsel should never have been appointed in this case.

BAKER: Can we put that on the record?

TRUMP: Because so far, the only — yeah, you can put it down.

SCHMIDT: Was that [Attorney General Jeff] Sessions’s mistake or [Deputy Attorney General Rod J.] Rosenstein’s mistake?

________

TRUMP: Look, Sessions gets the job. Right after he gets the job, he recuses himself.

BAKER: Was that a mistake?

TRUMP: Well, Sessions should have never recused himself, and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job, and I would have picked somebody else.

HABERMAN: He gave you no heads up at all, in any sense?

TRUMP: Zero. So Jeff Sessions takes the job, gets into the job, recuses himself. I then have — which, frankly, I think is very unfair to the president. How do you take a job and then recuse yourself? If he would have recused himself before the job, I would have said, “Thanks, Jeff, but I can’t, you know, I’m not going to take you.” It’s extremely unfair, and that’s a mild word, to the president. So he recuses himself. I then end up with a second man, who’s a deputy.

HABERMAN: Rosenstein.

TRUMP: Who is he? And Jeff hardly knew. He’s from Baltimore.

________

TRUMP: Yeah, what Jeff Sessions did was he recused himself right after, right after he became attorney general. And I said, “Why didn’t you tell me this before?” I would have — then I said, “Who’s your deputy?” So his deputy he hardly knew, and that’s Rosenstein, Rod Rosenstein, who is from Baltimore. There are very few Republicans in Baltimore, if any. So, he’s from Baltimore. Now, he, we went through a lot of things. We were interviewing replacements at the F.B.I. Did you know Mueller was one of the people that was being interviewed?

Оставляя даже в стороне всю бредовость "он мне должен был сказать до назначения, что возьмет отвод", главное тут в том, что Трамп явно считает, что Attorney General работает на него, на Трампа. И республиканские сенаторы это прекрасно понимают. Как понимают и то, что это, мягко говоря, disturbing.

И тем не менее:

A group of Republican senators criticized President Donald Trump on Thursday, a day after the President rebuked top law enforcement officials in an interview with The New York Times.

"The attorney general is America's top law enforcement official," one GOP senator said. "It's unclear if he understands that, and that's pretty disturbing."

The senator was referring to Trump's comment in the Times' interview that he would not have hired Attorney General Jeff Sessions had he known Sessions would go on to recuse himself from investigations related to the 2016 campaign. The senator said Trump seemed to be thinking of the law enforcement heads as his personal employees.

"One gets the impression that the President doesn't understand or he willfully disregards the fact that the attorney general and law enforcement in general -- they are not his personal lawyers to defend and protect him," one GOP senator told CNN. "He has (his) own personal lawyers, and of course, the White House has the White House counsel's office."

That Republican senator and two others spoke on background with CNN to avoid prompting a fight with the President. Maine GOP Sen. Susan Collins was the only one of the four to speak on the record in response to Trump's comments about Sessions, acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe and former FBI Director James Comey as well as his venting about the special counsel investigation into Russian attempts to influence the 2016 election. [...]

The third Republican said he was stunned by Trump's remark on Mueller, although he said "at this point" perhaps it shouldn't surprise him.

Comments

[tijd.livejournal.com]

Республиканцы проявляют свою легендарную храбрость и принципиальность. Причём боятся они не столько Трампа, сколько настоящих вождей партии - Раша Л. И Шона Х.

Indeed, among GOP lawmakers there remains a widespread fear that wading too conspicuously into the Russia controversy will unleash the wrath of figures like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity—conservative talk radio hosts whom one senior Senate aide referred to as “the modern-day party bosses.”
“It’s tough,” the aide told me. “Every time you speak out against Trump on Russia, you’re gonna get it.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/what-congressional-republicans-really-think-about-trump-and-russia/533784/

[yakov-a-jerkov.livejournal.com]

Хе, звучит правдоподобно.

[angerona.livejournal.com]

У меня с сегодняшнего дня есть новый кумир: Роберта МкКейн (мама Джона МкКейна -- нынешнего сенатора).

В частности вот ее мнение 2009го года (когда ей было 97 лет. Сейчас ей 105 и, насколько я вижу из прессы, она по прежнему в прекрасном светлом уме и форме). http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/05/14/mccain-mom-takes-swipe-at-limbaugh/

"The always-outspoken Roberta McCain - mother of Sen. John McCain - took a swipe at Rush Limbaugh Wednesday, saying the popular conservative radio host "does not represent the Republican Party that I belong to".

"I belong to the Republican Party," McCain, 97, said during an appearance on The Tonight Show With Jay Leno. "What he represents of the Republican Party has nothing to do with my side of it. I don't know what the man means, I don't know what he's talking about."

McCain also praised Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele for labeling Limbaugh an "entertainer" earlier this year during an interview on CNN.

"I think [Steele] was exactly right when he defined this man as an entertainer," she said. "To my horror, the Republican Party made him back up on it.""

[arbat.livejournal.com]

"conservative talk radio hosts whom one senior Senate aide referred to as “the modern-day party bosses.”

Влияние Лимбау и Хэннити определяется не тем, что они занимают какую-то специальную позицию в партийной иерархии, откуда они могут "по партийной линии" влиять на карьеры членов партии, а тем, что значительная доля избирателей ценит их мнение.

Жалобы, что какие-то Сенаторы вынуждены прислушиваться к мнению избирателей, - смехотворны.

Хотя тот факт, что Атлантик с симпатией относится к подобным жалобам, вполне понятен. Это издание Демократическое, и Демократы не любят все эти штучки, когда избиратели имеют свое мнение и влияют на Партию, когда должно быть - наоборот.

[zlobnyi-karlik.livejournal.com]

Влияние Лимбау и Хэннити определяется не тем, что они занимают какую-то специальную позицию в партийной иерархии, откуда они могут "по партийной линии" влиять на карьеры членов партии, а тем, что значительная доля избирателей ценит их мнение.

Позор просто какой-то...

Влияние Лимбау и Хэннити определяется тем, что оба – бессовестные демагоги и лжецы, засерающие мозги гражданам, которые, как всякое большинство в любой стране, не любят/не научены включать свои собственные мозги.

когда избиратели имеют свое мнение и влияют на Партию

Избиратели, миллионами слушающие Лимбау и Хэннити, не имеют своего мнения - точно так же, как и избиратели, смотрящие в России федеральные говноканалы, не имеют собственного мнения, которое отличалось бы от мнения говноканалов.

Вы бы еще Алекса Джонса выставили как выразителя народных чаяний.