![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Trump under investigation:
The special counsel overseeing the investigation into Russia’s role in the 2016 election is interviewing senior intelligence officials as part of a widening probe that now includes an examination of whether President Trump attempted to obstruct justice, officials said.
The move by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to investigate Trump’s conduct marks a major turning point in the nearly year-old FBI investigation, which until recently focused on Russian meddling during the presidential campaign and on whether there was any coordination between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. Investigators have also been looking for any evidence of possible financial crimes among Trump associates, officials said.[...]
Five people briefed on the requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, said Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy, and it is unclear how many others have been questioned by the FBI.
The NSA said in statement that it will “fully cooperate with the special counsel” and declined to comment further. The office of the director of national intelligence and Ledgett declined to comment.
no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 12:25 am (UTC)Это они о ком? Неужели...
no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 03:10 am (UTC)COMEY: Nothing that I can talk about in an open setting. I know —
KING: That takes care of the next three questions.
COMEY: I know it exists.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 12:27 am (UTC)Тhe Judiciary Committee has an obligation to fully investigate any alleged improper partisan interference in law enforcement investigations. It is my view that fully investigating the facts, circumstances, and rationale for Mr. Comey’s removal will provide us the opportunity to do that on a cooperative, bipartisan basis,” Grassley said in the letter.
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-agrees-feinstein-need-examine-justice-dept-fbi-decisions-politically
Похоже, избрание Трампа оказывает совершенно удивительное влияние на политические реалии: люди начинают понимать, для чего, оказывается, существуют те или иные демократические институты. Такими темпами, глядишь, через 3.5 года избиратели и журналисты поймут, что выборы существуют не для того, чтобы месяцами муссировать вопрос о хранении e-mail'ов.
no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 01:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 01:03 am (UTC)кстати, эту басню про русскиx xакеров, взломавшиx DNC таки доказали или демократы так и зажали свой сервер, предлагая всем верить им (демократам) на слово?
no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 01:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 01:32 am (UTC)В январе же это уже обсосали всё на сто раз, передали образы дисков, скорее всего, зачем им они в физическом виде-то:
>“This is normal practice,” says Matt Tait, founder and CEO of Capital Alpha Security. “In cases like this, the onus for digital forensics is on the third-party contracted by the company that's calling in the incident response team, in this case CrowdStrike.”
>It’s part of a long-standing division of labor between private firms and law enforcement, in which incident response firms handle the initial analysis and network cleanup, leaving broader legal questions to law enforcement. That division of labor saves time, but it also protects companies from what could potentially be seen as an invasion of privacy. Turning over a company’s entire network to a law enforcement agency can be an awkward proposition, particularly before the nature of the compromise is clear.
...
>Once incident response has been conducted, the crucial evidence can be handed over directly to officials without politically tricky questions of broader access. We don’t know exactly what CrowdStrike handed over (the company declined to comment), but that data can range from full disk images to an edited digest of suspicious files and logged connections. If CrowdStrike did image the server, any subsequent analysis would simply be confirming that the firm hadn’t screwed up.
>Law enforcement groups sometimes do double-check that data, but it’s unlikely to change the attribution itself. Even if CrowdStrike wanted to skew the results toward a particular party, the FBI would be able to check their work against data pulled directly from the network. “The IC would certainly be able to check the malware and associated technical data recovered from the DNC network themselves,” says Tait. “The FBI may be reliant on CrowdStrike to find malware on the DNC network, but they are not beholden to CrowdStrike's analysis.”
>We also know that the FBI suspected Russian involvement in the DNC breach long before CrowdStrike got involved. According to the Times’ recounting, the first contact between the FBI and DNC came in September 2015, a full seven months before CrowdStrike was contracted. The Times article doesn’t detail exactly what tipped the FBI off to the breach, but it’s fair to assume it was some version of the threat-sharing systems used at NCCIC and similar centers. Even in September, the FBI saw Russia as the prime suspect, tying the intrusion to a group of malware tools previously identified by F-Secure. While the FBI ultimately came to the same conclusion as CrowdStrike, it did so with far more information, drawing on data only federal law enforcement would have access to.
https://www.theverge.com/2017/1/5/14178806/fbi-dnc-hack-server-examined-forensics-russia
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 01:43 am (UTC)We assess with high confidence that the GRU relayed material it acquired from the DNC and senior Democratic officials to WikiLeaks. (High confidence generally indicates that judgments are based on high-quality information from multiple sources.)
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
Но мы уже установили, что ФБР, ЦРУ, АНБ и МВБ тайно сговорились и врут, а Путин говорит правду.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 02:42 am (UTC)Baron is the editor of the embattled Washington Post and has proven a penchant for publishing anti-Trump news that is almost always proven fake either days, weeks or months after if sees ink in the Post.
О каких анти-трамповских статьях конкретно речь, интересно?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 02:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 02:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 06:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 06:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 02:45 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 02:47 am (UTC)Ого!
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 02:54 am (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 12:01 pm (UTC)И что в итоге?
Недели не прошло, как "анонимные и надёжные источники" одной статьёй перебили весь успех.
no subject
Date: 2017-06-15 01:19 pm (UTC)Следствие Ведет Контрразведка V. Интересный выбор.
Date: 2017-06-19 03:02 pm (UTC)