Уже четверг
Jan. 5th, 2017 12:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
yakov_a_jerkovК этой записи: "Настанет день, и я скажу все, что я думаю по этому поводу".
И к этой записи: It's Wednesday.
Despite Promise, Trump Divulges No New Election Hacking Details:
И к этой записи: It's Wednesday.
Despite Promise, Trump Divulges No New Election Hacking Details:
The time that Donald Trump promised to reveal what no one else knew about the hacking of the Democratic Party has come and gone.US spy chiefs see 'multifaceted' Russian bid to disrupt election:
On New Year's Eve, Trump said that he knows "things that other people don't know, and so they cannot be sure of the situation."
Pressed by a reporter for details, Trump said, "You'll find out Tuesday or Wednesday."
But as Wednesday came to a close, Trump hadn't revealed any more details about the hacking of his campaign opponents, admitting only — in a tweet — that "somebody hacked the DNC" and alleging that the Democratic National Committee had weak cyberdefenses.
On Tuesday, however, Trump continued to taunt the U.S. intelligence community about its assessment that Russia was behind the cyberattacks, tweeting, "The 'Intelligence' briefing on so-called 'Russian hacking' was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"
But there was no delay, according to U.S. officials; the briefing was always scheduled for Friday. [...]
Regardless, U.S. officials said Assange doesn't know what he's talking about.
"There's no way that Assange would have any idea who was behind dropping this information off," said Matt Olsen, a former director of the National Counterterrorism Center and an ABC News contributor. "The Russian intelligence services are clearly capable of hiding their tracks."
US spy chiefs said Thursday that the hacking of Democratic Party computers was just one part of a multifaceted campaign by Russia to disrupt the American presidential election.
In a closely-watched Senate hearing, top intelligence officials presented a united front as they reiterated their conclusion that Moscow interfered with last year's campaign and that its cyber-meddling poses a "major threat" to the United States -- findings that President-elect Donald Trump has so far refused to accept.
"This was a multifaceted campaign. So the hacking was only one part of it, and it also entailed classical propaganda, disinformation, fake news," Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the Senate hearing.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 02:27 am (UTC)Но Вы не объяснили о моем информационном-пузыре.
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 02:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 03:39 am (UTC)Вражеские радиоголоса с их клеветническими измышлениями. Арбат таки 100% прав.
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 04:14 am (UTC)Вот это новость! А я так доверял его мнению.
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 04:41 am (UTC)Догадались бы мы, что хакеры были из России, если бы за ними так явно не торчали бы путинские уши? Тоже не факт.
Действительно, фактов не хватает.
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 04:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 06:01 am (UTC)зачем она проголосовала за анти-израилскую резолюцию
Как и остальные 13 стран, из антисемитизма.
почему там до сих пор отрицают участие украинских националистов в Холокосте?
Не знаю, может, стесняются.
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 06:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 06:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 06:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 06:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 11:59 am (UTC)Но из этого явно следует, что кто-то пытался преступными методами повлиять на политический процесс. Intended to interfere, как все время и говорится. Это факт.
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 02:23 pm (UTC)ну, как например NYT раздобыла tax forms Трампа и делилась с нами информацией. или запись его частной беседы была опубликована. нарушила ли NYT закон? хмм. где они вообще взяли эти формы? хммм. пытались ли они interfere? да безусловно. "Federal and state laws make it illegal to publish an unauthorized tax return or return 'information.'"
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 02:28 pm (UTC)так что главный помощник Трама это Хиллари. she is #1, #2 and #3
ну и вся демократическая партия обосралась конечно. Берни бы победил Трампа без проблем
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 03:17 pm (UTC)Вот представим завтра китайцы(иранцы, северокорейцы, ISIS, и т.д.) выступят и скажут этот румынский хакер(или какой-то другой) действовал про нашему заказу. Кого-то это убедит изменить свою текущую точку зрения? То есть какова фальсифицируемость-то?
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 03:37 pm (UTC)ну, это уже домыслы чистой воды
http://www.newsweek.com/myths-cost-democrats-presidential-election-521044
no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-01-06 04:32 pm (UTC)