1. concerns that continued investigation would call into question the legitimacy of his election 2. potential uncertainty about whether certain event <...> could be seen as criminal activity by the President, his campaign, or his family
Эти мотивы являются коррупционными. Они не имеют отношения к законным "public image concerns", которые относились бы к интересам страны, а не к интересам Трампа.
ему разрешено вмешиваться в процесс отправления правосудия
Вмешательство в расследование нарушает установленные нормы автономии Министерства юстиции и ФБР. Но по закону у президента, как главы исполнительной власти, есть такое право, если только только он не делает это по коррупционным мотивам.
В отчете Мюллера этот вопрос подробно разбирается:
Direct or indirect action by the President to end a criminal investigation into his own or his family members' conduct to protect against personal embarrassment or legal liability would constitute a core example of corruptly motivated conduct. So too would action to halt an enforcement proceeding that directly and adversely affected the President's financial interests for the purpose of protecting those interests. In those examples, official power is being used for the purpose of protecting the President's personal interests. In contrast, the President's actions to serve political or policy interests would not qualify as corrupt. The President's role as head of the government necessarily requires him to take into account political factors in making policy decisions that affect law-enforcement actions and proceedings. For instance, the President's decision to curtail a law-enforcement investigation to avoid international friction would not implicate the obstruction-of-justice statutes. The criminal law does not seek to regulate the consideration of such political or policy factors in the conduct of government. And when legitimate interests animate the President's conduct, those interests will almost invariably be readily identifiable based on objective factors.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2019-06-03 10:20 pm (UTC)Мюллер перечисляет следующие мотивы:
1. concerns that continued investigation would call into question the legitimacy of his election
2. potential uncertainty about whether certain event <...> could be seen as criminal activity by the President, his campaign, or his family
Эти мотивы являются коррупционными. Они не имеют отношения к законным "public image concerns", которые относились бы к интересам страны, а не к интересам Трампа.
ему разрешено вмешиваться в процесс отправления правосудия
Вмешательство в расследование нарушает установленные нормы автономии Министерства юстиции и ФБР. Но по закону у президента, как главы исполнительной власти, есть такое право, если только только он не делает это по коррупционным мотивам.
В отчете Мюллера этот вопрос подробно разбирается:
Direct or indirect action by the President to end a criminal investigation into his own or his family members' conduct to protect against personal embarrassment or legal liability would constitute a core example of corruptly motivated conduct. So too would action to halt an enforcement proceeding that directly and adversely affected the President's financial interests for the purpose of protecting those interests. In those examples, official power is being used for the purpose of protecting the President's personal interests.
In contrast, the President's actions to serve political or policy interests would not qualify as corrupt. The President's role as head of the government necessarily requires him to take into account political factors in making policy decisions that affect law-enforcement actions and proceedings. For instance, the President's decision to curtail a law-enforcement investigation to avoid international friction would not implicate the obstruction-of-justice statutes. The criminal law does not seek to regulate the consideration of such political or policy factors in the conduct of government. And when legitimate interests animate the President's conduct, those interests will almost invariably be readily identifiable based on objective factors.