he could've reached a decision as to whether it was criminal activity
Вывод о фактах “criminal activity” Мюллер сделал - по всем десяти эпизодам попыток помешать правосудию.
The Mueller report describes several acts that satisfy all of the elements for an obstruction charge: conduct that obstructed or attempted to obstruct the truth-finding process, as to which the evidence of corrupt intent and connection to pending proceedings is overwhelming. These include: · The President’s efforts to fire Mueller and to falsify evidence about that effort; · The President’s efforts to limit the scope of Mueller’s investigation to exclude his conduct; and · The President’s efforts to prevent witnesses from cooperating with investigators probing him and his campaign. https://medium.com/@dojalumni/statement-by-former-federal-prosecutors-8ab7691c2aa1
Он не мог открытым текстом назвать Трампа преступником, потому что это лишало бы того возможности защитить своё имя в суде: “It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge.”
Он мог назвать Трампа невиновным, но не стал этого делать: “As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.”
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2019-06-02 03:26 pm (UTC)Вывод о фактах “criminal activity” Мюллер сделал - по всем десяти эпизодам попыток помешать правосудию.
The Mueller report describes several acts that satisfy all of the elements for an obstruction charge: conduct that obstructed or attempted to obstruct the truth-finding process, as to which the evidence of corrupt intent and connection to pending proceedings is overwhelming. These include:
· The President’s efforts to fire Mueller and to falsify evidence about that effort;
· The President’s efforts to limit the scope of Mueller’s investigation to exclude his conduct; and
· The President’s efforts to prevent witnesses from cooperating with investigators probing him and his campaign.
https://medium.com/@dojalumni/statement-by-former-federal-prosecutors-8ab7691c2aa1
Он не мог открытым текстом назвать Трампа преступником, потому что это лишало бы того возможности защитить своё имя в суде: “It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge.”
Он мог назвать Трампа невиновным, но не стал этого делать: “As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.”
А Барр заврался https://yakov-a-jerkov.livejournal.com/1678482.html?thread=60896146#t60896146