yakov_a_jerkov: (Default)
yakov_a_jerkov ([personal profile] yakov_a_jerkov) wrote2019-04-30 07:22 pm

Мюллер и Барр

Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe:
Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.

At the time the letter was sent on March 27, Barr had announced that Mueller had not found a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials seeking to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Barr also said Mueller had not reached a conclusion about whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, but Barr reviewed the evidence and found it insufficient to support such a charge.

Days after Barr’s announcement, Mueller wrote a previously unknown private letter to the Justice Department, which revealed a degree of dissatisfaction with the public discussion of Mueller’s work that shocked senior Justice Department officials, according to people familiar with the discussions.

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”

The letter made a key request: that Barr release the 448-page report’s introductions and executive summaries, and made some initial suggested redactions for doing so, according to Justice Department officials.
И без этой информации мы знали, что Барр в своем письме злонамеренно представил доклад Мюллера в совершенно misleading свете. Мы также знаем, что Барр на должности AG исполняет роль лакея Трама.

Но Мюллер... Он решил написать Барру письмо?!

Мюллер после двух лет расследования лучше любого другого знает, что имеет дело с мошенниками. Speak up, еслки-палки! Какой смысл писать частные письма жуликам?

[identity profile] affidavid.livejournal.com 2019-05-01 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Так казалось бы почему не наезжать на Трампа по серьезным делам, а не beat а dead horse дебильной конспирологии? Я этого никак не могу понять. Такое чувство, что рептилоиды поделились с Трампом секретным рецептом превращать своих противников в идиотов.

[identity profile] tijd.livejournal.com 2019-05-01 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)
почему не наезжать на Трампа по серьезным делам

"Obstruction of justice", доказанное Мюллером - это уголовное преступление https://yakov-a-jerkov.livejournal.com/1329100.html?thread=43478732#t43478732

Но по другим нарушениям конституционного долга дело тоже движется https://yakov-a-jerkov.livejournal.com/1502516.html?thread=52323636#t52323636

This is a tremendous victory & vindication of a commonsense reading of the Constitution. In an extraordinarily well-reasoned opinion, the court soundly rejected the President’s absurd argument that he is above the law. The next step should be discovery & full disclosure. https://t.co/g53K8Xwj1M

— Richard Blumenthal (@SenBlumenthal) April 30, 2019

Edited 2019-05-01 16:14 (UTC)

[identity profile] ny-quant.livejournal.com 2019-05-01 06:20 pm (UTC)(link)

Такой уж у них TDS.

[identity profile] affidavid.livejournal.com 2019-05-01 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Надо назначить независимого прокурора для расследования действий трампорептилоидов заражающих демократов TDS. Даже если он не получит прямых доказательств, то уж обструкция по дороге точно найдется.