надо именно что увязать obstruction с corrupt act того же лица
Сообщение не соответствует действительности.
Obstruction является "corrupt act" даже если мотив для попытки помешать расследованию не связан с соучастием в преступлении, которое расследуется. В отчете Мюллера это поясняется:
Obstruction of justice can be motivated by a desire to protect non-criminal personal interests, to protect against investigations where underlying criminal liability falls into a gray area, or to avoid personal embarrassment. The injury to the integrity of the justice system is the same regardless of whether a person committed an underlying wrong.
Есть знаменитые прецеденты - вроде Марты Стюарт, которую не осудили за финансовое мошенничество, но осудили за попытки помешать его расследованию.
Про возможные мотивы Трампа в отчете Мюллера тоже говорится:
In this investigation, the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference. But the evidence does point to a range of other possible personal motives animating the President's conduct. These include concerns that continued investigation would call into question the legitimacy of his election and potential uncertainty about whether certain events-such as advance notice of WikiLeaks's release of hacked information or the June 9, 2016 meeting between senior campaign officials and Russians could be seen as criminal activity by the President, his campaign, or his family.
QUIGLEY: This investigation began at its very start as a counterintelligence investigation. The American public needs to know we are still on that. The House Select Committee on Intelligence continues that work through the subpoena process. The Justice Department just released some of the documentation to us. But we are ready to proceed if at any point they stop cooperating. It is extraordinarily important for folks to know that Mueller thought that most of that was outside the scope of his investigation. But it's fair for us to ask whether the president of the United States was compromised. And, frankly, I believe he was.
no subject
Сообщение не соответствует действительности.
Obstruction является "corrupt act" даже если мотив для попытки помешать расследованию не связан с соучастием в преступлении, которое расследуется. В отчете Мюллера это поясняется:
Obstruction of justice can be motivated by a desire to protect non-criminal personal interests, to protect against investigations where underlying criminal liability falls into a gray area, or to avoid personal embarrassment. The injury to the integrity of the justice system is the same regardless of whether a person committed an underlying wrong.
Есть знаменитые прецеденты - вроде Марты Стюарт, которую не осудили за финансовое мошенничество, но осудили за попытки помешать его расследованию.
Про возможные мотивы Трампа в отчете Мюллера тоже говорится:
In this investigation, the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference. But the evidence does point to a range of other possible personal motives animating the President's conduct. These include concerns that continued investigation would call into question the legitimacy of his election and potential uncertainty about whether certain events-such as advance notice of WikiLeaks's release of hacked information or the June 9, 2016 meeting between senior campaign officials and Russians could be seen as criminal activity by the President, his campaign, or his family.
Про подлинный мотив было бы интересно узнать.
QUIGLEY: This investigation began at its very start as a counterintelligence investigation. The American public needs to know we are still on that.
The House Select Committee on Intelligence continues that work through the subpoena process. The Justice Department just released some of the documentation to us. But we are ready to proceed if at any point they stop cooperating.
It is extraordinarily important for folks to know that Mueller thought that most of that was outside the scope of his investigation. But it's fair for us to ask whether the president of the United States was compromised. And, frankly, I believe he was.