у "антитрампистов" проблемы с Трампом не ограничиваются подозрениями в сговоре с Россией

Интересен случай Энн Эпплбаум. В январе 2017 (после публикации досье Стила) она писала, что не стоит пытаться отыскивать свидетельства тайного сговора Трампа с Путиным, посколько того, что на поверхности и так больше, чем достаточно.

Information doesn’t have to be secret to be shocking. Trump doesn’t have to be a Manchurian candidate who has been hypnotized or recruited by foreign intelligence. It’s enough that he has direct and indirect links to a profoundly corrupt and violent foreign dictator, whose policies he admires, whose advisers he shares and whose slogans he uses. That’s kompromat enough for me.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/stop-obsessing-over-secrets-about-trump-and-russia-what-we-already-know-is-bad-enough/2017/01/13/1f6caf26-d9c8-11e6-b8b2-cb5164beba6b_story.html

Однако в июле 2018 (после Хельсинки) она же пишет о косвенных свидетельствах тайного сговора, по которому путинские хакеры передали сворованные данные избирательной кампании Трампа.

Shared data could also explain why Trump appeared to feel so indebted to Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, why he wanted to speak to him with no aides present, why he is so reluctant to acknowledge Russian interference. It could even explain why he talks so obsessively and inaccurately about the size of his great electoral victory: because he himself believes that the Russians helped him win. He fears that this would make his presidency illegitimate. Which it would.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/did-putin-share-stolen-election-data-with-trump/2018/07/20/50854cc8-8c30-11e8-a345-a1bf7847b375_story.html