Достаточно перечитать вот этот отрывок из вашей ссылки на factcheck:
The Times details how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One, a Canadian-based company that sold a controlling stake in 2010 to Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency, in a deal that had to be approved by the U.S. government. Uranium One had mining stakes in the Western United States, amounting to one-fifth of the uranium production capacity in the U.S., the Times reported. The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren’t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after the Times story, the foundation acknowledged that it “made mistakes,” saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company.
20% не отрицает никто, даже самые достойные борцы за демократию. Вклад Клинтон тоже не отрицает никто. Спор идет лишь о трудностях доказательства quid pro quo. Ну да, не такая она дура чтобы прямо в карман брать, через фонд получала. Молодец.
Только полный идиот будет рассчитывать, что кто-то поверит что тут всё чисто. Детский сад, ей богу.
no subject
The Times details how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One, a Canadian-based company that sold a controlling stake in 2010 to Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency, in a deal that had to be approved by the U.S. government. Uranium One had mining stakes in the Western United States, amounting to one-fifth of the uranium production capacity in the U.S., the Times reported.
The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren’t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after the Times story, the foundation acknowledged that it “made mistakes,” saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company.
20% не отрицает никто, даже самые достойные борцы за демократию. Вклад Клинтон тоже не отрицает никто. Спор идет лишь о трудностях доказательства quid pro quo. Ну да, не такая она дура чтобы прямо в карман брать, через фонд получала. Молодец.
Только полный идиот будет рассчитывать, что кто-то поверит что тут всё чисто. Детский сад, ей богу.