Историю про уран подкинул Peter Schweizer, автор книжки "Clinton cash". Его работу оплатил GAI (Government Accountability Institute) - организация Стива Бэннона. Идея подкинуть историю из "Clinton cash" в NYT была частью стратегии Бэннона:
Bannon has been able to hack mainstream media news coverage because these "Clinton Cash" stories and the various relationships that the book documented were intentionally not published on right-wing sites like Breitbart News. What GAI did instead was to reach out to investigative reporters and mainstream media outlets like The New York Times, The Washington Post and others and try and encourage their reporters to take this research that they'd done and to go off and do some digging on their own. And they did, and that wound up resulting in front-page stories in a lot of major newspapers that got this negative information about Clinton in front of a whole different audience than reads Breitbart News or listens to talk radio. http://www.npr.org/2016/11/17/502413784/journalist-says-steve-bannon-had-a-years-long-plan-to-take-down-hillary-clinton
В чем стратегический смысл вытаскивать это прогнившее говно сейчас, бог его знает.
no subject
Несколько раз в том числе повторял любимую утку про Хиллари и уран и жаловался, что "nobody talks about that."
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Первая публикация про Хиллари и уран была в New York Times в апреле 2015:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
Тогда же обвинения были признаны несостоятельными.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/04/27/back-to-basic-facts-in-latest-hillary-clinton-scandal-story/
Но это не помешало их полоскать еще полтора года.
Историю про уран подкинул Peter Schweizer, автор книжки "Clinton cash". Его работу оплатил GAI (Government Accountability Institute) - организация Стива Бэннона. Идея подкинуть историю из "Clinton cash" в NYT была частью стратегии Бэннона:
Bannon has been able to hack mainstream media news coverage because these "Clinton Cash" stories and the various relationships that the book documented were intentionally not published on right-wing sites like Breitbart News. What GAI did instead was to reach out to investigative reporters and mainstream media outlets like The New York Times, The Washington Post and others and try and encourage their reporters to take this research that they'd done and to go off and do some digging on their own. And they did, and that wound up resulting in front-page stories in a lot of major newspapers that got this negative information about Clinton in front of a whole different audience than reads Breitbart News or listens to talk radio.
http://www.npr.org/2016/11/17/502413784/journalist-says-steve-bannon-had-a-years-long-plan-to-take-down-hillary-clinton
В чем стратегический смысл вытаскивать это прогнившее говно сейчас, бог его знает.